On Jan 29, 2008 6:36 AM, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would also avoid any queueing issues by not supporting it, so signaling > a aignal n times might result in <= n invocations (and maybe this is why > the sig_atomic_t member might not be there). > > Also, the uer would be responsible to only run ev_async_send on started > watchers etc. etc. > > all that would piggypack nicely on top of the existing signal handling. > > feedback from people on this would be nice. >
That all sounds fine to me. -- Tony Arcieri ClickCaster, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
