On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:12 +0100 Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0100, Malek Hadj-Ali > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1/ Is it okay to copy/paste the documentation into my own work > > (adjusting it where it needs to be adjusted, of course). > > Yes, as long as you adhere to the libev license when doing so. Okay. > > > 2/ I intended to publish it under the GPL2 licence. Is it okay with > > you, Mark? > > Marc, and it is your decision. I think it is pointless to wrap a bsd > licensed library with a (likely thin) GPL2 (only?) wrapper, but it is > your code. Oops, sorry for the Marc/Mark confusion. > > > Do you think it is compatible with your own licence? > > It explicitly mentions this in every file. It is both compatible and I see that now, it is not mentionned in LICENSE though. > can be relicensed to GPL version 2 or any later version. Note that > you will have to maintain your own copy of the library then, as libev > cannot accept gpl-only code. Just to be clear, I do not intend to embed libev, just to depend on it, so maybe the all licences questions are pointless (I really don't know). > > > If not what kind of free licence would you recommend? > > I'd recommend using the same license as libev itself (read ev.h for > details), to avoid confusion by users. > > But it really _is_ up to you. Okay. Thanks for yor answers. malek > _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
