On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16:43AM -0500, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least for me using it embedded with my compiler/cflags/etc (which > include -Werror, which is what makes it a pain why I compile on targets
Well, specifying -Werror is a rather stupid thing to do (if it is gcc, it turns gcc into a non-conforming C compiler...), and certainly isn't supported by libev: libev cannot make workarounds for all existing compiler warnings, there are too many compilers out there and too many warnings that trigger on correct code. Since it is so trivial, I have little problems with applying this workaround, but in general, I'd like to avoid yntactical lutter that makes maintainance harder just to compile with a deliberately broken compiler. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev