On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:15:49 +0300, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:54:41PM +0300, Kandalintsev Alexandre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have any tests showing this problem?
No, but you don't need any tests, the basic problem is that epoll doesn't
know about fork, so when a process forks, a) the parent will receive
events for file descriptors of the child and b) the parent can do nothing
about it, as it cannot remove the fds from its set. This property is by
design and well known. It's a feature, basically.
Oh, the first link in google folows to your post in lkml :). I'll
carrefully read it
and if I find any suggestions I'll mail you.
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
