On 20/12/2008, at 5:10 PM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:44:07PM +0000, James Mansion <[email protected]
> wrote:
because the design decision to have the multiple-init bug
undetectable is
effectively made. I'm just objecting to Mr Lehman's
characteristically
condescending and heavy-handed 'its not possible'.
You'd be well-advised to read what I wrote. I explicitly wrote that
the only
methods to do so are requiring initialisation, or remembering the
address of
the watcher structure in some other way.
While it might be possible that there is yet another variant (that
isn't
just a play on those two principal ideas), nobody so far came up
with one.
So if it *is* possible, then please state how.
Hey, you could always use C++ and have a constructor :)
Just thought I'd throw that out there. Lol..
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev