At 1258158276 time_t, Marc Lehmann wrote: > So what do you think, should signalfd usage be requested explicitly and > otherwise not be used?
I'd vote for having an option to explicite enabled signalfd usage. We have been bitten by the "con" you described, and it's not pleasant to try to work it around, and even not always possible. > If we adopt this, then I would change libev to have these creation flags: > > #define EVFLAG_NOSIGFD 0U // for compatibility > #define EVFLAG_SIGFD 0x00400000U // to request signalfd support Sounds goods. -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <[email protected]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Tomorrow I was nothing, yesterday I'll be.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
