On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:34:31AM +0200, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > __x86 is not defined here, __i386 is.
Ah, I thought __x86 was more reliable. > Maybe extend the check to include some more of > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/predef/index.php?title=Architectures#Intel_x86 Fortunately, no, the other compilers would not test true for the gcc version check, so we only have to check for gcc there. And the "i386" macro mentioned there is almost certainly wrong. __i386__ however is the way to go. I've updated libecb and libev accordingly. Thanks! -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected] -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
