.... my first post in this thread is about backing the top-poster's patch for why this patch should be applied, because there might be software that has 0/1/2 closed at the time it wants to initialize libev AND checking a return code for <= 0 for errorness instead of < 0 is in my eyes still a bug. that's it. period.
Secondly, do not conclude things I did not explictely write (closing fds does not increase performance, I never said saving 3 more fds increases performance). Also, you represent something, like you are the maintainer of a very important piece of software. Do not treat people like shit (indirectly), like you did the very first time I met you by just reading my host mask, like you did in almost every other past I read about you, and like you did the very now. Do not imply anything just by reading email addresses, they might mean nothing regarding the current topic. Please stay calm and try being as polite as possible instead of blaming everywhere around, selfishly, and giving everyone else the feeling that you're "the" perfect guy in the world. People already forked your project in the back-rooms for that particular reason, which is not nice, but maybe the best to get not offendet anymore. Regards, Christian.
_______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
