On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Marc Lehmann <[email protected]> wrote: > now, the "redundant" thing is of course a re dherring - static is also > completely redundant, but still many symbols are declared static for good > reasons :)
By redundant I meant that they don't seem to change the result of compilation. Declaring symbols static is not redundant, it is an absolutely necessity, especially on Linux where symbols from shared libraries tend to leak all over the place. :) Anyway, I just filed a bug report on clang bugzilla, I hope I described it correctly: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11910 _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
