On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 14:40 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > I would be interested to learn under which conditions the availibility of > epoll_create1 and/or EPOLL_CLOEXEC is an actually measurable optimisation, > as opposed to being a correctness issue.
I dont have any numbers. More that you pass the close on exec flag in libev with epoll_create1 which i find useful. With epoll_create(256) (where 256 used to mean num of descriptors) it essentially sys_epoll_create1(0) with kernels from the last 1-2 years which is missing the close on exec. If that doesnt matter, why dont i just undefine EPOLL_CLOEXEC. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
