On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 04:10:41PM +0400, Vladimir Afinello
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I pass a group of watchers at a time (at least 5), so at this moment I'm in
> a callback of a one of that watchers.
That is no problem - after you stop() a watcher the loop will not access
it in any way anymore.
> Should I wake the current thread loop to perform stop() on the other
> watchers in a group?
I am not sure what that means, but again, if the watchers are stopped,
then the loop will no longer access them.
> I thought, the loop isn't in a wait state at that time since the callback
> is executed.
The loop state is safely serialised to memory while a watcher callback is
executed. Basically, when you are inside a callback, you are in the same
state as code running outside the loop.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
