On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 01:00:13PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring
<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 2. Would it eventually need to be protected by a mutex (from the
> >> multi-threading perspective)?
> >
> > Using a mutex in a signal handler is neither conforming nor working in
> > practise, so far worse than the current approach.
>
> I find it interesting that the statements "ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_ACQUIRE" and
> "ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_RELEASE" were added recently.
And whats the connection to mutexes and signal handlers here? Your mails
to this list seem to become less and less sane - if you want to contribute
or discuss something, that's fine, but your mails seem to be nothing more
than random statements without meaning or relevance to libev.
I would urge you to change course into more productive directions because
frankly, I do not have time for this.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
