On 05.04.2013 13:06, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 05.04.2013 12:59, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Saying libev "does not work on BSD" just means that you
You are way too angry to be taken seriously, Marc. I never said, what you put
into quotes. Never ever.
Well, looking back, I can see, what could've been misread to mean, what you
quoted:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 08:25:24PM -0400, "Mikhail
T."<[email protected]> wrote:
04.04.2013 16:08, Tony Arcieri ???????(??):
If it doesn't work on Linux it's worthless.
It does not... Which, I suppose, makes it only slightly less useless
that libev. Because libev does not even work on BSD.
Thrown off by Tony's inflammatory remark, I was not careful with my own choice
of words. I was referring to my test-program, which was able to discern
directory-changes on BSD, when using libevent, but not when using libev.
The same libevent-using method was not working on Linux, which made it
"worthless" in Tony's educated opinion, and I pointed out, libev can not be used
for the purpose even on BSD (can it?) -- which would make the method even more
"worthless" in the same opinion...
-mi
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
