Thank you for quick response (and for nice library of course). Radek Laska
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Lehmann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:25 PM To: Laska Radek Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: The special problem of time updates On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:43:23AM +0200, Laska Radek <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) There is example in documentation how avoid this. Is this example > correct? I think there should be: > ev_timer_set (&timer, after + (ev_time () - ev_now () ), 0.); > instead of: > ev_timer_set (&timer, after + ev_now () - ev_time (), 0.); Well spotted - yes, you are right, the formula in the documentation was wrong (and is now fixed). > 2) It will be nice add ev_time to C++ wrapper (ev++.h). Is it > possible in next version? It's already there, as ev++.h provides all of ev.h as well, so ev_time is available whenever you include ev++.h -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected] -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
