26.02.2016, 20:50, "Marc Lehmann": > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've prepared ABI changes/backward binary compatibility report for the >> recent versions of the libev: >> http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/libev/ > > Cool thing, and makes me quite happy to see so many 100%s. > > Some things look fishy, though: > > http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/compat_report/libev/3.9/3.31/1b3e7/abi_compat_report.html#Removed > > That lists 12 removed symbols, but I a m not aware of them ever being > removed. And especially not in 3.31, which only had a tiny patch compared to > 3.3. > > I think the title shows the problem: > > Binary compatibility report for the libev.so object between 3.9 and 3.31 > versions on x86_64 > > Maybe the report compares a newer version (3.9) with an older version > (3.31), and thus concludes that the old version is not ABI compatible with > the newer one? > > That would explain this. The libev version numbers are actual _numbers_, > so 3.9 > 3.31, not version strings, which might explain the issue? >
Hello Marc, The order of versions has been fixed: http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/libev/ Thanks a lot! _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/libev
