On 11.01.2017 08:14, Marc Lehmann wrote: > The area *is* a legitimate memory location, and I am sure valgrind agrees. Umm, while it's legitimate to access it, the problem is that it cannot have any defined content – an interrupt could alter the data stored there at any time.
Valgrind knows that, thus it complains. > The instruction is a standard memory fence pattern also used by linux > for example, Linux uses 0(%esp). Why are you using an offset of -1? An offset of zero would fix the problem. -- -- Matthias Urlichs _______________________________________________ libev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/libev
