@Etienne, Azat: Many thanks to all of you.

Regards,
Laon Ton


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Azat Khuzhin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Tôn Loan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Jan and Steffen,
> >
> > Thank all of you for giving the solution as well as experience about
> > multi-threading
> >
> > @Jan: Getting these things right can take some trial and error; one thing
> > I'd advise is to look at what mature projects do, because they have
> > often (though not always) done all the mistakes and learned from them.
> >
> > Can you suggest me some mature projects as you said?. I searched many
> times
> > but I have not enough experience to choose the mature project to follow
>
> Hi,
>
> What about mature projects with libevent and multiple threads you can
> take a look at libevhtp in particular (but this is for TCP):
>   https://github.com/ellzey/libevhtp/blob/develop/evthr.c
>
> It uses socketpair() to distribute jobs between threads (AFAIR).
>
> Also there already was similar question, you can read it too:
>   http://archives.seul.org/libevent/users/Mar-2016/msg00007.html
>
> And I'm voting for not using threads until you really need them too
> (and indeed sometimes syncing primitives can make it slower then
> single-threaded program). Plus what you are describing here (every
> thread use it's own port) can be implemented with spawning multiple
> processes (but maybe it won't be optimal choice indeed).
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Cheers,
> Azat.
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with
> unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.
>

Reply via email to