On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Leif Thuresson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Azat, > Thanks for your reply. > Using one event_base per thread is an idea I haven't thought of - > Interesting. > One drawback that comes to mind with this design is that a network > connection > will stay with the same thread forever.
If you need, you can move it into another event_base later, just remove all active events, and then re-add that events into another event_base. > About bufferevents and built-in openssl support. > Yes I looked at this and it would certainly simply my code, but with > my original design idea all the SSL encryption would have been done in the > thread running the event_base so that's why I ruled it out. Do you have any pros for this idea? Azat. P.S. please do not use top-posting. *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
