Hi
> The easiest thing to do here is to use the event_active() call to make > the event active now. But it doesn't do quite what you asked for: the > callback will be run later in the current iteration of the loop, not > in the next iteration. If it needs to be in the next iteration, I > can't offhand think of a better way than adding an event with a 0 > callback. no that's exactly what I need. I just have to return form the callback function because buffer_chain_free has to finish and after that the new function can be called. Thanks :-) _______________________________________________ Libevent-users mailing list Libevent-users@monkey.org http://monkeymail.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
