On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Evan Jones <ev...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2010, at 21:13 , Clint Webb wrote: >> >> After the Timeout event was fired, it seemed as though the event was >> no longer queued, even though EV_PERSIST was specified. >> >> Is this different behaviour expected? > > I think the answer is yes. From the "whatsnew-2.0.txt" file: > >> 2.6. Timeouts and persistent events work together. >> >> Previously, it wasn't useful to set a timeout on a persistent event: >> the timeout would trigger once, and never again. This is not what >> applications tend to want. Instead, applications tend to want every >> triggering of the event to re-set the timeout. > > Hope this helps,
Ahh, excellent. Thankyou. Dont know how I missed reading that file. *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
