On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > On 30 Aug 2011, at 11:54 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > >> Folks have submitted patches, and I commented on the patches to >> suggest revisions, and they never revised. I can try to look more >> closely in the future. > > I did find this mentioned previously: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3036905&group_id=50884&atid=461324 > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3036914&group_id=50884&atid=461324 > > I have an existing server implementation that needs https in addition to > http, so using a completely different implementation is quite a change for > us.
Actually, those patches look pretty good to me. They'll need some cleanup and documentation (and see also https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3401054&group_id=50884&atid=461324 ), but they look basically like what I thought would be the right thing here. I'll see if I can get on getting those into 2.1 some time this week. Also, we should probably start planning a 2.1.x-alpha release schedule: there are getting to be enough new little features and improvements that people might want to start trying it out. cheers, -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
