On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Nick Mathewson <ni...@freehaven.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nick Mathewson <ni...@freehaven.net> wrote: >>> For more background, folks should see >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nss_compat_ossl looks sweet. > > Want to see whether Libevent passes its unit tests when using that? > I'm curious, but won't have time to check for a while.
I'm in the same boat. >> By the way, OpenSSL does not have a stable ABI; according to >> http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg23746.html, >> each release has a new ABI. This is one of the reasons why >> it's not part of the LSB. (I suppose this might have changed now >> that OpenSSL's hit 1.0, but I rather doubt it.) > > I think they're trying to move towards a more stable ABI with the > addition of OPENSSL_NO_SSL_INTERN in 1.0.1, but I bet it will take a > while before they add enough accessor functions. Awesome. Or, rather, about f'ing time. The curmudgeon in me suspects they'll finish that about the time everybody else finishes moving to nss. - Dan *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
