On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the status of the signalfd branch? It seems like the main > problem with the implementation is the use of sigprocmask whose behavior > isn't specified in a multithreaded environment and from my testing, > doesn't have the desired effect. Even using pthread_sigmask wouldn't > help since it only blocks signals for the current thread.
Hi, Ross! The discussion on this ticket should bring you up to speed. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3436038&group_id=50884&atid=461324 > Also, what is the reason that the default signal backend cannot have > different event bases receiving different signals? Largely for historical reasons: we didn't implement it that way at first, and to date, it's not a feature that folks have asked for. -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
