libftdi  

Messages by Date

• 2010/10/07 RE: ftdi_usb_close() error Michael Plante
• 2010/10/07 ftdi_usb_close() error Mikael Krus
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/07 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/07 FYI: libusb-win32 1.2.2.0 released Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux DJ Delorie
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux DJ Delorie
• 2010/10/06 RE: Design decisions, was: Re: Claiming devices... Michael Plante
• 2010/10/06 Re: Design decisions, was: Re: Claiming devices... Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Design decisions, was: Re: Claiming devices... Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/06 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux DJ Delorie
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Michael Plante
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Michael Plante
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Michael Plante
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Michael Plante
• 2010/10/05 RE: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Michael Plante
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/05 Re: Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/05 Re: /usr/bin/astyle Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/05 Claiming devices has no effect under Linux Thomas Klose
• 2010/10/04 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/04 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/04 /usr/bin/astyle Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/04 Re: Provide API access to decoded EEPROM structure Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/04 Re: Provide API access to decoded EEPROM structure Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/04 Re: Decode/Encode use_usb_version on BM and 2232C Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/04 Re: Decode/Encode use_usb_version on BM and 2232C Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/10/04 Re: Decode/Encode use_usb_version on BM and 2232C Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/04 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/04 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Wilfried Holzke
• 2010/10/03 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/03 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/10/03 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Decode/Encode use_usb_version on BM and 2232C Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Use new EEPROM value API in examples/eeprom.c Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Provide API access to decoded EEPROM structure Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Provide API access to decoded EEPROM structure Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Name define more explicit Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/02 Re: I'm thinking of starting a new personal project with an FTDI, has anyone tinkered with smart cards? Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/10/01 I'm thinking of starting a new personal project with an FTDI, has anyone tinkered with smart cards? John Oyler
• 2010/10/01 Now subscribed from my personal email... John Oyler
• 2010/09/30 Re: Use of ftdi-sio and libftdi on different interfaces of the same instance of FT4232 (and similar) Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/30 Re: Use of ftdi-sio and libftdi on different interfaces of the same instance of FT4232 (and similar) Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/30 Use of ftdi-sio and libftdi on different interfaces of the same instance of FT4232 (and similar) Ales Teska
• 2010/09/29 Re: libusb device search problem Robert Hubley
• 2010/09/29 Re: libusb device search problem Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/27 Re: Another approach to get frint formatting right Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/27 Re: stable ABI Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/27 Re: Another approach to get frint formatting right Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/26 RE: Another approach to get frint formatting right Michael Plante
• 2010/09/26 Another approach to get frint formatting right Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/26 Re: libftdi-1.0: examples/streamtest.c: Fix fromatting warnings Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/26 Re: libftdi-1.0: examples/streamtest.c: Fix fromatting warnings Jim Paris
• 2010/09/26 Re: libftdi-1.0: examples/streamtest.c: Fix fromatting warnings Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/26 Re: libftdi-1.0: examples/streamtest.c: Fix fromatting warnings Jim Paris
• 2010/09/26 Re: stable ABI Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/26 libftdi-1.0: examples/streamtest.c: Fix fromatting warnings Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/26 EEPROM-Branch: Document examples/eeprom.c write option Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/25 Re: libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 libftdi eeprom-new git branch MinGW 32bit snapshots for testing only Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/25 Re: Patch: Fix warnings in example/stream_read Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/25 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Amount of data in ftdi_read_eeprom Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Amount of data in ftdi_read_eeprom Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 [EEPROM branch] Amount of data in ftdi_read_eeprom Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: EEPROM: Battery powered field Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: EEPROM: Battery powered field Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: EEPROM: Battery powered field Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: EEPROM: Battery powered field Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Wilfried Holzke
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Dynamic string offset calculation Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Dynamic string offset calculation Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Dynamic string offset calculation Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] Dynamic string offset calculation Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 Re: EEPROM: Battery powered field Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/24 [EEPROM branch] Dynamic string offset calculation Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Wilfried Holzke
• 2010/09/24 [EEPROM branch] "size_check" init value Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/24 EEPROM: Battery powered field Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/23 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/23 Re: FT245RL after flash like a 232R Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/23 FT245RL after flash like a 232R Wilfried Holzke
• 2010/09/23 Using FT2232H to receive IRQs from peripherals. Avi Albo
• 2010/09/20 libusb-win32 usb.h and MinGW-w64 usb.h conflict solution Xiaofan Chen
• 2010/09/20 Re: EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/20 Re: EEPROM handling work Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/17 I am working with ubuntu linux 10 & the dlp 1232h board with a ft2232h chip it does not apear in tty joshua wojnas
• 2010/09/17 Re: stable ABI Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/17 Re: stable ABI Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/17 RE: stable ABI Michael Plante
• 2010/09/17 Re: stable ABI Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/17 Re: stable ABI Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/17 Re: stable ABI Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/16 RE: stable ABI Michael Plante
• 2010/09/16 Re: stable ABI DJ Delorie
• 2010/09/16 stable ABI Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/16 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/16 Re: EEPROM handling work Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/16 Re: EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/16 Re: EEPROM handling work Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/16 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/16 Re: Patch: Enable -Wall in CMAKE build process Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work DJ Delorie
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work DJ Delorie
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work DJ Delorie
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/15 Re: EEPROM handling work DJ Delorie
• 2010/09/15 EEPROM handling work Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/14 Patch: Enable -Wall in CMAKE build process Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/14 Patch: Fix warnings in example/stream_read Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/10 RE: I've discovered the nature of my problem, but I don't know how to fix it... can anyone suggest something? Michael Plante
• 2010/09/09 Re: Non-blocking read John Oyler
• 2010/09/09 Re: Non-blocking read Szőke Sándor - Alex
• 2010/09/09 Re: Trouble with TTL232R. Szőke Sándor - Alex
• 2010/09/09 I've discovered the nature of my problem, but I don't know how to fix it... can anyone suggest something? John Oyler
• 2010/09/08 Non-blocking read Anton A. Litvinov
• 2010/09/08 Non-blocking read Anton A. Litvinov
• 2010/09/08 Libftdi, ft2232D and a Semtech SX1211 radio (spi). John Oyler
• 2010/09/08 Re: Trouble with TTL232R. VDR User
• 2010/09/08 Re: Trouble with TTL232R. Szőke Sándor - Alex
• 2010/09/07 Re: 3.8.1 Set TCK/SK Divisor (FT2232D) Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/07 FT2232D bitbang mode. John Oyler
• 2010/09/07 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/07 RE: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Michael Plante
• 2010/09/07 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/07 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/06 Re: Trouble with TTL232R. Helge Lenz
• 2010/09/05 Trouble with TTL232R. VDR User
• 2010/09/03 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/03 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/03 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/03 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/02 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Emmanuel Blot
• 2010/09/02 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/02 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger
• 2010/09/02 What happened to: "[PATCH] added function-call to access version information" Uwe Bonnes
• 2010/09/02 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/02 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Thomas Jarosch
• 2010/09/01 Re: merging of libusb-1.0 support into mainline Mike Frysinger

• Earlier messages
• Later messages