On Tuesday, 25. May 2010 17:34:18 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]> writes: > Thomas> Uwe, On Thursday, 20. May 2010 00:39:32 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > >> >>>>> "Xiaofan" == Xiaofan Chen <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> >>>>> The > >> > >> last patch doesn't use the libusb return, but the errno() set >> > >> by the system. > > Xiaofan> I see. In that case, I think your patch is ok. > > >> Who does apply the patch in libftdi-1.0 ? You or Thomas? > > Thomas> The last and most current version was from "18.05.2010 16:08" > Thomas> and is for libftdi-1.x only, right? > > Yes, the patch from "18.05.2010 16:08" is the right one, applicable only > on libftdi-1.0. > > The patch implements the same logic as libftdi-0. With libusb-1.0 there > is no more need for the ifdef, as libusb_detach_kernel_driver() is > available on all platforms, also as a nop() on some.
Thanks Uwe, applied. Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
