Manu, On Monday, 14. June 2010 13:20:36 Emmanuel Blot wrote: > > Ok with that. How does Darwin handle 64-bit? Is Apple still using > > "universal binaries" like the used to > > when they supported different processors? > > Yes they do. A single executable unit can contains several versions of > the binary code (powerpc, powerpc_64, i386, x86_64). > However this patch will only build one of the version (32-bit or > 64-bit), not both at once. > I guess it could be improved to build a universal binary, but I never > tried building one with CMake.
Luckily there's a cmake FAQ for this: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_build_universal_binaries_on_Mac_OS_X.3F > > Does this also work if we move the > > "+include_directories(${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS})" part > > to the Boost specific code in ftdipp/CMakeLists.txt? > > I suppose so, I could give a try. Do you want this to be part of 0.18? Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
