On Wednesday, 13. April 2011 04:40:33 Michael Plante wrote: > Dunno what to say about libftdi-1.0, but my concern was with > libftdi-0.1/git, which still doesn't seem to have 3b92d47 reverted.
As far as I can see from the archive, the discussion was still going on? Is that thing easily revertible with git or do I need to do it manually? Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to libftdi+unsubscr...@developer.intra2net.com
