On Monday, 5. September 2011 20:02:53 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > All H type behave the same until now. So no need to duplicate the > expected results, as this may introduce errors. The test should loop > through the same challanges with the different types.
Done > Also my code uses the 120 MHz clock, as soon as possible (458 Baud). > This results in a more exact baudrate. This is different form the old > behaviour, that didn't know about the 120 MHz clock in the H parts. Yeah, it's funny how the 57600 baudrate jumps to 120 Mhz and all the others use the 48 Mhz clock again. > I will read the datasheets again about AM, BM and R. I suspect, BM and R > also behave the same, but will explicit report later. AM probably has no > documentation, I have also no physical sample, so things are vague. I don't have an AM sample either. Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
