Hi Ali, On Monday, 25 September 2017 12:35:45 CEST Ali Ebrahimi wrote: > Thank you for the quick reply, Thomas. > > Does this mean libftdi 1.x should not have this problem? > > Also, would you please let me know if the sync fifo mode of 232h has been > tested and if there is a working example?
I think the timeout code was never forward-ported to libftdi 1.x and so far nobody complained :) Back in the days I was a bit hesitant about the code change since it will change the behavior for existing applications. Regarding the sync FIFO mode, either someone else on the list has an idea or I would look around the git history who contributed the code and ask this person. It will probably work. Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
