On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:30:04AM +0000, Matthew Booth wrote: > On 22/11/11 16:47, Greg Scott wrote: > >>The missing files can't be distributed with Fedora. > > > >The obvious question - why not? > > > >-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 994 Feb 14 2011 firstboot.bat > > This file should be included with virt-v2v in Fedora. It was omitted > accidentally. > > >-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4324584 Feb 14 2011 rhev-apt.exe > > Unfortunately the license on this file doesn't permit us to > distribute it with Fedora. > > >-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 68928 Feb 14 2011 rhsrvany.exe > > Rich: isn't this GPL? Could we include rhsrvany.exe in Fedora?
Yes, although I'm not sure what the latest state of the project is. > If we could distribute rhsrvany.exe, we could make the migration > work in the absence of rhev-apt.exe. I think this would be a good > solution for Fedora. rhev-apt should be open sourced too. Not sure why it isn't ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
