* Richard W.M. Jones: >> I think that an extra target (mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma) would make >> the .NOTPARALLEL unnecessary. > > Right, I remember this was a problem now. > > It was fixed by: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/dce94f3e266ed3f1fc634a1ef6953f2db1510963 > > Do you think we could re-add the stamp-file / touch $@ ?
Sure, it would have to be modified so it still works if OCAMLOPT is not available -- that's why I made that change in the first place. Wouldn't a rule without commands such as mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma also prevent make from building the two targets in parallel? Cheers, -Hilko _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
