On Fri, Mar 28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I guess the question from me is why the user would want to use zypper > from $PATH, instead of zypper which supermin had been configured and > tested against? Is it common that SUSE users want to try different > versions of zypper?
It might be a corner case, but in case one wants to use a specific binary from PATH for testing its now required to rebuild either supermin (and maybe libguestfs if it also uses AC_PATH_PROG). And its not specific to zypper, any other binary would have the same issue. For the time being the specfile now exports the full path to zypper. Olaf _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
