Hi Daniel, On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > >> rpm_is_avaiable verification > >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > > the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 > > uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides, etc. > > If rpm_is_available returns false, that means you built without librpm, > > and that supermin will not really work. Did you tried running the test > > suite (`make check`)? > > > > These are the results of make check in the system I've used to test the > patch. The system is > in an internal isolated network, thus I believe some failures were > expected to happen. > > > PASS: test-basic.sh > PASS: test-execstack.sh > FAIL: test-build-bash.sh > FAIL: test-binaries-exist.sh > SKIP: test-harder.sh > FAIL: test-build-bash-network.sh > FAIL: test-binaries-exist-network.sh > SKIP: test-harder-network.sh > make[4]: Entering directory `/root/supermin/tests' > make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/supermin/tests' > ============================================================================ > Testsuite summary for supermin 5.1.12 > ============================================================================ > # TOTAL: 8 > # PASS: 2 > # SKIP: 2 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 4 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > I've run the non-related network tests to see the failure cause. It is > worth saying that supermin > upstream code builds and runs fine as far as I can tell, thus I couldn't > figure it out much reading > these errors: > > # ./test-build-bash.sh > ./test-build-bash.sh: line 34: 83872 Aborted ../src/supermin -v > --prepare $USE_INSTALLED bash -o $d1 > # ./test-binaries-exist.sh > ./test-binaries-exist.sh: line 29: 83886 Aborted ../src/supermin -v > --prepare $USE_INSTALLED bash coreutils -o $d1
These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. > I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the > rpm_is_available > check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal > patch we used to add > temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermin (the > version shipped > with RHEL 7.1 GA). > > I assumed that rpm_is_available failed because ibm-powerkvm does not > have all the rpm features > fedora and rhel have, although it uses rpm/yum. Perhaps in a later > release of the OS, using > a newer version of supermin, we should review this code and enhance it. As I said, I'm pretty sure it's because you are building without librpm, and you should have got in configure's output something like: checking for LIBRPM... no Please try the following: - install rpm-devel (being a Fedora-based distro, you should have it) - get supermin 5.1.12 - apply your ibm-powerkvm patch - readd the rpm_is_available check (basically reverting [1]) - run ./configure and check that you have "LIBRPM... yes" - build and run the test suite If things work, you should get 6 tests passing and 2 skipped (we can make these 2 working as well later). [1] https://github.com/libguestfs/supermin/commit/b2b0f29efb537161df0286f4a9d5cfe94206be18 -- Pino Toscano _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
