On Tuesday 29 September 2015 12:55:31 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > ---
> > src/copy-in-out.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/copy-in-out.c b/src/copy-in-out.c
> > index 0dd8cd3..2b1e4d4 100644
> > --- a/src/copy-in-out.c
> > +++ b/src/copy-in-out.c
> > @@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ guestfs_impl_copy_in (guestfs_h *g, const char
> > *localpath, const char *remotedir
> > char buf[buf_len];
> > const char *dirname, *basename;
> > CLEANUP_FREE char *tar_buf = NULL;
> > + struct stat statbuf;
> > +
> > + if (stat (localpath, &statbuf) == -1) {
> > + error (g, _("source '%s' does not exist (or cannot be read)"),
> > localpath);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> >
> > int remote_is_dir = guestfs_is_dir (g, remotedir);
> > if (remote_is_dir == -1)
>
> NACK. See the patch series I just posted.Would patch #2 be acceptable anyway, as simple starting check? -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
