On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:41:35PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > - libvirt is way more complex and fails much more frequently :-( > > > > It's unfortunately because of the last point that if libvirt fails to > > start the qemu appliance, we print an error message telling you to try > > with LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct. > > > > > That was one of the motivations. You were hit by it too apparently ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271183 ).
That's one of the bugs. Coincidentally I conducted a test last night to quantify the incidence of libvirt errors, and I'm going to post the results shortly. Rich. > I removed the connect line and set the environment variable and all looks > good. I indeed don't see any much different performance difference. > > Thanks! > Y. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
