On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:31:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > It eases the debugging, instead of getting just the name of the struct > > returned. > > The series is fine, so ACK. Definitely improves the trace output :-)
Thanks -- I got tired of not seeing what was returned in case of structs. > A few things that would be good though: > > - Export the functions through the public API. We already have > functions to copy structs (eg. guestfs_copy_application, > guestfs_copy_application_list). Would be actually worth exporting them for general usage, though? I thought about this, and I did not find immediate use cases; although I can change idea if there are enough/good ones. After all, making the current functions public is trivial job once there's the need for them. > - Provide another function for printing lists of structs too, so you > don't need the loop for RStructList. That would follow suit with the above: currently the loops for RStructList is needed only in one (private) place. -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
