On Friday, 16 June 2017 17:03:34 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:42:35PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > NACK to utils.h -- in the past I've seen a couple of libraries > > installing public includes as utils.h. They have been fixed, but > > I'd like to avoid conflicts between an installed header and a project > > header. > > Can we prevent incorrect installation (which I agree could be a huge > problem) in some other way? Maybe it can be done with an > install-*-hook. I will see ...
Oh sorry, most probably I did not explain very well. The situation that I'd like to avoid is: a library installs /usr/include/utils.h (evil!), or /usr/include/$foo/utils.h, and we make use of it (directly or indirectly) by including /usr/include/$foo. Possibly it is a so-corner-case that could be ignored for now, though. -- Pino Toscano
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs