On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:55:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously posted in 2015: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html > v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html > > I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling > mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the > tests, which pass. > > As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where > you can no longer pass a handle between threads and expect > guestfs_last_error() to work. I'm somewhat more sanguine about this > change, since using the API like that is abstruse and no one should be > expecting that to have worked.
Yeah, I think it is reasonable to expect that any use of guestfs_last_error should have been done immediately after the API call that failed, and in the same thread. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
