On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:29:33PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 14:21:51 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:57:08PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > Would it be possible to use oUnit too? > > > > I'm not clear on what benefit oUnit gives us which is worth the extra > > dependency it pulls in. > > I was referring to OUnit2, which we already have an optional dependency > for almost all the OCaml tests.
Sure, understood. But what would we lose by converting those to simple programs that just ran a series of "assert"s? If a single test fails we have to fix it anyway. If the lack of oUnit2 means that other users are skipping those tests, oUnit2 may be a negative. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
