On Sunday, 8 October 2017 23:26:56 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Instead of using ‘xpath_(string|int|int64)_default’ we can write the > equivalent code using ‘Option.default’. This is not quite so concise, > but may be easier to understand. > > eg: > xpath_int_default xctx "xpath_expr" 10 > -> > Option.default 10 (xpath_int xctx "xpath_expr") > ---
LGTM. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
