On Thursday, 23 August 2018 17:44:21 CEST Sebastian Meyer wrote: > Hi Pino, > > On 23.08.2018 17:21, Pino Toscano wrote: > > No problem with the patch, just one question: can it happen that zypper > > may decide to install packages when removing others, e.g. to keep some > > other dependency/relationship satisfied? > > > > [...] > > Of course the example above is overly simplified -- though, > > can the above happen? > > > > I don't think so. If I remove bash for example, it just removes it along > with everything that depends on bash. > > There are some cases where it provides multiple solutions, but in those > it just chooses 'cancel' when -n/--non-interactive is set.
Understood, thanks for the explanation. Your patch LGTM, and I will push it shortly. Thank you for your first contribution! -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
