On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:33:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 05:02:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > Still, since you cannot do the test for Bitlocker, my idea was that > > you could make the test for non-lvm parition encrypted by LUKS as > > that would check some of the other code. > > ... cryptsetup cannot create a new BitLocker disk, which is rather > unfortunate. I created a BitLocker disk using Windows, and I'll > privately send you a link, but because of the cryptsetup problem > there's no way to automate this kind of test.
If anyone is looking for a fun thing to hack on, it could be interesting to add bitlocker support to QEMU's crypto block layer. That would give you ability to create volumes with qemu-img, etc. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
