On 04/11/22 12:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:34:30PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 04/11/22 12:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> I'd like to remove the unused -o json mode.  The implementation is
>>> over-complicated and the only potential user (KubeVirt) isn't using it
>>> now and would be better off with a proper -o kubevirt mode, which I'm
>>> going to implement later.
>>>
>>> My plan would be to add the patches in two stages.  The first patch,
>>> which only removes the documentation but leaves the feature and test,
>>> would be applied to stable branch virt-v2v 2.0.  The second patch
>>> would be go on the development branch 2.1 (which hasn't yet been
>>> created).  The first stable release without this feature would be 2.2.
>>
>> If the second patch goes on the 2.1 dev branch, then why wouldn't the
>> 2.1 release include it? (IOW the 2.1 release would not have "-o json"
>> any more.)
> 
> Just sticking to the convention so far that 2.x for odd x are
> development releases.  We don't care about maintaining backwards
> compatibility during the development cycle.

OK -- so 2.1 will contain the patch (it will not have "-o json"), it's
just that we don't call 2.1 a "stable" release.

Thanks for explaining!
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs

Reply via email to