On 05/03/22 12:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 08:59:13AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 05/01/22 12:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Although the protocol is an internal detail of libguestfs that we can >>> change whenever we want, unfortunately some distros ship the binary >>> appliance to their users, either the one we supply, or one built >>> themselves. >> >> Urgh. I was aware that the proc_nr's must always match, but didn't think >> they were treated as public ABI. > > So I want to be clear for the record that they are not public ABI, and > nothing about the protocol is stable. But nevertheless we shouldn't > break some distros, even if they are doing the wrong thing, when it > only requires a trivial adjustment at our end.
Understood, thanks! Laszlo _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
