On 09/09/22 15:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 02:53:11PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 09/09/22 13:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>> On 09/08/22 18:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590721
>>>>> v1:       
>>>>> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2022-September/029806.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Please see the Notes section on each patch for the updates in this
>>>>> version (addressing v1 feedback). Patch #5 is a candidate for dropping
>>>>> in particular.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also including a range-diff between v1 and v2, below.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> I meant to append: v2 builds fine at every stage again, and I retested
>>>> full conversions too, with both states of the new boolean knob.
>>>
>>> Updated series is fine, thanks.
>>
>> Should I drop patch#5? Dropping #5 seems to follow directly from
>> Daniel's suggestion, and I wanted to clear it with you before merging.
> 
> That's the one which sets the default?  I don't have a preference or
> enough knowledge on this to say which is best, whatever you think.

OK, I've dropped patch#5.

Commit range 0687cea6a86e..6f1adeba1aab.

Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs

Reply via email to