On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: >> I haven't tried HIDAPI that Peter mentioned, but it sounds like it >> might offer a more portable solution. > > Indeed. With libusb there is still the matter of kernel drivers. The > Windows support in libusb-1.0 tries to fake it on top of the HID API > but I don't really think that's a good approach. > > HIDAPI on the other hand is tailored specifically for HID, on Win > Mac Linux, works *with* the kernel drivers instead of against them, > is simpler (less generic) than libusb, and I think the best solution > for byte level communication with HID class devices. >
HIDAPI under Windows and Mac OS X are using the native HID API. Theoretically it should work with USB HID device and Bluethooth HID device. Under Linux, the default is to use libusb-1.0 (USB only). But it can also be used with hidraw kernel driver. The hidraw kernel driver backend for HIDAPI is only for very recent kernel version and the hidraw driver may still need some further work. The good thing about it is that it works with Bluetooth HID device. Combining the HIDAPI and the libhid HID parser may be an interesting work. If the GPL license of the HID parser is a problem for some users, then another more liberal license of HID parser needs to be written. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ libhid-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/libhid-discuss http://libhid.alioth.debian.org/
