On 12.11.2006 [11:18:21 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:39:40AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 03.11.2006 [11:52:26 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > Here are a pair of patches adding extra testcases for some of the
> > > kernel bugs recently found by Hugh Dickins.  These patches went to the
> > > linux-mm list and some other people, but haven't made it to this list
> > > yet, and appear to have dropped by the wayside.
> > > 
> > > As extra testcase patches, these should both be low risk.
> > 
> > Ok, I've noticed a problem with truncate_sigbus_versus_oom. On a G5
> > running 2.6.19-rc5, with 200 hugepages allocated, I get:
> > 
> > truncate_sigbus_versus_oom 200 (32):    FAIL    mmap() reserving all pages
> > truncate_sigbus_versus_oom 200 (64):    ./run_tests.sh: line 30:  8482 
> > Segmentation fault      PATH="obj$BITS:$PATH" 
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:../obj$BITS" $ENV "$@"
> > 
> > But with only 100 hugepages allocated, I get:
> > 
> > truncate_sigbus_versus_oom 100 (32):    PASS
> > truncate_sigbus_versus_oom 100 (64):    PASS
> 
> Ah, yes.  In fact there are several testcases with this problem.  The
> 32-bit version fails because it attempts to consume all available
> hugepages, but runs out of address space first.
> 
> > Beyond the known truncate_above_4G issues, these are the only tests that
> > fail on the G5 with 200 hugepages allocated. Should we constrain the
> > maximum parameter sent to this test?
> 
> No.  If we constrain the parameter, we won't get the oom condition
> that these tests require.  What we need to do is to consume all the
> pages without using all the address space.  With a shared mapping
> that's pretty easy: just map block of pages that will fit in the 32
> bit address space, then unmap them (they won't be discarded because
> they're in the persistent hugetlbfs file), then map the next block
> from an offset higher than the first block and so forth until all the
> pages are consumed.
> 
> I've been meaning to implement this, but have been chasing more
> important bugs.  Feel free to go for it...

Fair enough, I'll add this to my todo.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel

Reply via email to