On 23.02.2007 [14:34:27 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi all, > > It appears that libhugetlbfs 1.1 will be a retag of 1.1-pre2. If it > hasn't already been rolled out as such, it will be early next week. In > anticipation of that, I'm going to go ahead and post 7 patches that I've > got sitting in my tree waiting to be applied. The first 5, marked TBA > have been tested and appear ready for post-1.1 merging. The last 2 are > RFCs, one of which has been posted before, which are based upon the > first 5.
Sigh, so my mailing may have screwed up the subjects and numbering, but the threading should be correct and the patches are all what they should be. Please comment on the last two in particular, as well as any strong NACKs for the first five. Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
