On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 02:43:26PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 23.02.2007 [14:34:27 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It appears that libhugetlbfs 1.1 will be a retag of 1.1-pre2. If it
> > hasn't already been rolled out as such, it will be early next week. In
> > anticipation of that, I'm going to go ahead and post 7 patches that I've
> > got sitting in my tree waiting to be applied. The first 5, marked TBA
> > have been tested and appear ready for post-1.1 merging. The last 2 are
> > RFCs, one of which has been posted before, which are based upon the
> > first 5.
>
> Sigh, so my mailing may have screwed up the subjects and numbering, but
> the threading should be correct and the patches are all what they should
> be.
>
> Please comment on the last two in particular, as well as any strong
> NACKs for the first five.
Well, not actually a NACK, but I tend to think that 1, 3, 4 & 5 would
be as well off folded into a single patch.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
