On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 29.07.2008 [19:41:06 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote:
[snip]
> I envision skip_test to be used only for temporarily skipping a test
> when we know it causes a kernel oops, for instance. But we eventually
> want to remove all skip_test from the library proper (as we fix the
> kernel issues). I also think flooding the screen with a bunch of SKIPs
> is a bit annoying.
Actually I think flooding the screen with a bunch of SKIPs is a good
thing in this case. If the up-to-date method of handling relinking
*hasn't* been tested it *should* be made obvious to whoever's running
the testsuite.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
